Can imagination be learned?

kophzi

Active member
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
57
Points
33
I can imagine myself imagining, am I doing it right
 

CarburetorThompson

Fuel Atomization Enjoyer
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
1,196
Points
153
I think a good place to start is trying to remember your dreams. Everyone dreams, there is no exceptions, some people just don’t remember them when they wake, some people remember them when they wake but forget after a minute or so. That’s why people keep dream journals and such.
 

Le_ther

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
302
Points
78
I'm curious about this concept, because imagination is one of the most crucial aspects about being a writer. Without the ability to imagine oneself in a parallel world with its own rules, customs, and people, it would be impossible to write a good book no matter how many words one knows. Either you couldn't write a book at all, or it's going to have more stuff taken from other media then original content.

I think of myself as a very imaginative person. The book I'm writing currently is pretty expansive, and pretty original for what it is. I do add in some things from other media, but its usually just to match a specific tone instead of taking specific scenes and repeating them one by one. As a kid, I've always imagined myself in the world of the TV shows I've watched, creating new plot points based off of what I would do, and how the characters would bounce off my character.

Then I had a discussion with someone a few weeks ago, where they told me that no matter what they did, they just couldn't imagine well. Here's a test.

Close your eyes and think of an apple. What do you see. Can you see an apple, or is it a blank void.

If the apple is there, then can you tell me major details about it? Is the apple red, green, yellow, or some strange color. How does light bounce of the surface of the apple?

Touch the apple in your mind. How does it feel? Bite into it. What does it taste like? Did your bite go through smooth, or did your teeth catch on the roughness of the fruit?

Depending on how many answers you can give, and how far you can detail the apple, will depend on the amount you can imagine scenarios. Granted, the apple test is easy since its not really coming up with original stuff, and not even stuff not applicable to our reality, but if you can describe even the minute details of an apple, I'd say you could imagine a great deal of things.

Thats where the interesting part comes in. The person I was talking to said they couldn't even past the first step. They couldn't imagine the apple. They can answer the question using the memory of them eating an apple a day prior, but they can't imagine a fake apple or describe them eating the fake apple.

Which brings up the question? Can imagination be taught? Would they be able to see an apple in their mind one day, or is the level of imagination one has depend from the day we are born? Would it be possible for someone to write a somewhat original story if they can't imagine their story within their minds by using the memory previous stories they've read? I'm genuinely curious about this.
There is only one answer I have found.


It is to do your imagination and make it reality.

Lets give a comparison and let's say it's like a blueprint. In our minds we imagine things as something we like or something to achieve. We get blurry instructions on what's the outcome we want to see.


The only thing that stops you is yourself. In order to achieve this we need to be dedicated, motivated, and do effort to achieve the goal we set up.


To sum it up, we can teach ourselves to do what we do in our imaginations as long as you do progress everyday towards it.
 

AliceShiki

Magical Girl of Love and Justice
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
3,530
Points
183
Imagine having Aphantasia and being a writer...
like...Mark Lawrence...
Yes.. imagine.. but you cant, because you have aphantasia.
It's certainly wild to read about that... I can't really imagine what it is like to have aphantasia... Like, how does that work?

... At the same time, I can't exactly imagine how being neuro-normative works, since I have ADHD and Light Autism, so like... Well, I guess it's normal to not understand how those things work~

Still, it's kinda mindblowing... Especially when there are authors who suffer from it~
 

Paul_Tromba

Sleep deprived mess of a published author
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Messages
4,289
Points
183
Loosely related to people the have no inner monologue.... and I recall... don't quote me, 30 to 50 percent of people have no inner monologue.

Me thinking how the hell to people talk to themselves, if they can't, how do they achieve self actualization?
My stepdad told me once that I should be in a mental institution because I had an inner voice.
 

Cipiteca396

More Gasoline 🎶
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Messages
2,177
Points
153
My stepdad told me once that I should be in a mental institution because I had an inner voice.
That reminds me of a story where someone developed an inner voice after not having one all her life, and thought she was going crazy.

...Maybe she was. :blob_evil:
 

Zirrboy

Fueled by anger
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
1,144
Points
153
Loosely related to people the have no inner monologue.... and I recall... don't quote me, 30 to 50 percent of people have no inner monologue.

Me thinking how the hell to people talk to themselves, if they can't, how do they achieve self actualization?
I on the other hand don't get the importance of one. I have inner voice, but doesn't most thought happen without it anyway?
 

Omnifarious

The Synaptic Nebula
Joined
Dec 6, 2019
Messages
361
Points
133
I on the other hand don't get the importance of one. I have inner voice, but doesn't most thought happen without it anyway?

Google say...

ways of thinking are:
  • Inner speech: Our inner monologue in which we speak words in our minds.
  • Inner seeing: Imagining an image in our minds that doesn’t match what we’re seeing in reality. For example, you might conjure an image of a place you want to vacation.
  • Unsymbolized thinking: Thinking but without employing words, images, or other symbolic methods of communication. For instance, you might go through the motions of brushing your teeth without consciously envisioning or telling yourself to complete each step.
  • Feeling: Consciously considering your emotions. For example, acknowledging that you’re feeling overjoyed after getting good news.
  • Sensory awareness: Idly thinking about one sensory aspect of the environment while not thinking about others. For instance, on a windy day, you may feel the wind and the way it makes your clothes blow around you, but instead of thinking about those things you may focus your thoughts on how cutting the wind feels on your hands.


Some people may think in all five of these ways, while others may be limited to one or two. As a result people without an inner monologue are likely to be thinking in one or more of the four ways that don’t involve inner speech.

So
Pros and Cons of Your Inner Monologue

An inner monologue has been found to have benefits across a wide range of domains, including planning, problem solving, self-regulation, self-reflection, emotion regulation, and perspective taking.

One’s inner monologue can also be a source of motivation, instruction, and positive self-reinforcement.

On the other hand, for some people, self-criticism is a regular feature of their inner monologue. This is a major drawback of inner monologues, and studies have found self-critical self-talk is associated with lower self-esteem and more frequent automatic negative statements about the self

The other ways of thinking that don't involve an inner monologue, outlined above, likely have benefits and drawbacks as well, but more research is necessary to understand what they may be.
 

CupcakeNinja

Pervert Supreme
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
3,104
Points
183
I agree with you and I don't deny what you're saying, so I don't see what your point is.
I only say that imagination and creativity are different labels that do not refer to the same thing. Whether they co-exist or not (which they do), does not invalidate that. And context determining whether such distinctions are necessary or not—The distinction is meaningless, I suppose, for your purposes; but for the purposes of studying how new ideas are engendered in consciousness, these distinctions become vital.
Im not sure where i was going there either. I was pretty deep in alcohol when i visited this thread, probably thought you meant something else
 

Ssthat

Boo Tao Main
Joined
Mar 3, 2022
Messages
186
Points
83
i believe with enough time and effort it's possible to learn anything, but clearly some are naturally better than others
 
Top