You mean how marriage is nothing but a ceremony for the woman to gain ownership of your future financial assets if she one day decides she's "not happy" anymore? Oh, and how divorce courts will back the woman's rape and molestation of the man's net worth, future social and professional prospects as long as she puts on a little water works show in trial? And probably even without the crying. Courts just won't defend a man against a woman.
Well until they introduce no fault divorce and stupid laws that basically cripple men, and scare off other men into not starting families.
Romance is almost never explored properly by authors, because many authors for some reason equate romance to sex or sexual relations.
Romance is more deeper than skin deep lust. It is emotional attraction and companionship forged between individuals that bond each with other, it be one of the forms of love that can form.
I say this because love is not inherently romantic, but romance is inherently based in love.
At least by the mainstream authors, who submit to that improper narrative for the sakes of sales, and sticking with the group. Degeneracy has been weaponized through the prospect of profits, and authors want a share of that wealth even if that wealth will come to being a vital risk to another.
“For a man, according to Evola, the highest ways belong to the Ascetic and the Warrior, corresponding to the Brahmin and Kshatriya castes respectively. Both these paths “affirm themselves in a life that is beyond life”, the former through jnana yoga, or total detachment, and the latter through bhakti yoga, or pure action. The woman, on the other hand, fulfills herself as Lover or as Mother. Note, here, that in Evola’s scheme the man can fulfill himself totally on his own, but a woman only in relation to a man. Through devotion to her lover or her son, a woman gives herself totally to another being, thereby fulfilling herself. Evola concludes this discussion:
To realize oneself in an ever more decisive way along: these two distinct and unmistakable directions, limiting in the woman everything that is man and in man everything that is woman, approaching the absolute man and the absolute woman – such is the traditional law for the sexes, according to the various planes of life.
Perhaps Evola did not exhaust all the roles since men can also be Fathers and some women are ascetics. Logically, it is necessary for men to be Fathers otherwise women could not be fulfilled as mothers. Even among the Kshatriyas, there is the archetype of the Judge who decides with perfect justice. The vaishyas are neglected, but there are many who through dedication to knowledge or service to the community can find fulfillment.
To return to the spectrum of the absolute man and woman, we are left wondering. For example, where do the Ascetic and Warrior sit on this spectrum? Guenon answers this question when he points out that the Brahmin is oriented to superhuman states while the Kshatriya (warrior) tends to the realization of all the possibilities of the human state. This makes it clear that the Ascetic is more transcendent than the Warrior.”
Absolute man Absolute woman
