I found the swap tenses to be a problem, so I'll take them into account.
However, the 'introduction of story elements is probably the best definition I can give between good and bad literature. Some novels take their plot structure from that of their favorite TV show(s) and think they can go from point A to C as long as they provide structural evidence as to what and why it's going on to make it a logical occurrence. The structural evidence comes from either first-person inner voices and monologues or third-person author notes that guide the reader into thinking it's foolproof since another party is present and has no qualms about what is taking place.
Also, I don't know where you got the 'Therefore rule,' but that sounds just as amateurish as the 'Show Not Tell' principle that first-time authors are told when they need help with plot structure. Situations in the real world don't move in chronological order, and some cases don't have relevance unless you speculate or decide to continue with an open mind (they wouldn't get anywhere in law enforcement if they just quit after two things didn't add up). Therefore the rule is kind of useless (EXCEPT if you need help with plot structure, then it is very useful to take into account); when in the next chapter, there was no talk of 'space politics,' the genetic children were explained in detail, along with who and why the aliens were mentioned by the scientist (but you can only get so much from just reading the first chapter, so this type of review isn't without its flaws).
This forces the reader to ask questions, and why I implemented it into my writing style because I despise hand-holding and have a love for books that act as mysteries despite not being a mystery themselves: Forcing us to ask questions and make inferences just to be hit with an 'Aha, but there's more!' (Lord of the Mysteries does this incredibly well.)
I just wanted to give feedback and explanation to your review since some new writers might scroll down these feedback forums looking for the Do and Do Nots (as I once did). But, not all writing has to follow the same principles, and should always try to look for better ways to storytelling.
Uhh oh boy.
In terms of your point about tv structure, it's a bit confused. People CAN based how they write off of television, but you're ignoring the fact there are universal structures and styles that television, movies, and books use. That's not to say these things are inflexible, but just because a story is written with. . . acts? I actually don't know the specifics you pull from tv and not something else, doesn't mean it was copied from teleivsion. And once again, you're really having trouble expressing yourself in a logical way here that tracks.
In terms of the Therefore Rule. . . yeah. It IS a rule. Every professional book writer, screen writer, and Wright Brother would agree with me here. From a simple conversation to overall plot structure, there's a flow. And it exsists because it is logical. A progression if you will. There can be deveations (obviously), but even those deviations are behold to certain rules (e.g. and then x happens, and we flash back to explain it. It has a proper structure, it's just presened out of order).
And your point about breaking the rules is a very important one I don't think I've ever had to talk about on here. Especially as it pertains to new authors. Yes, you CAN break the rules. But there's the question if you should break the rules. Happily, it's a question no human being needs to answer, because if you're a new writer or lacking so much confidence that you need advice on the basics, you shouldn't break the rules. Once you know how to write, then you can add deviations, flourishes, art. I don't have to add these asterix, because if you read my thread for advice, you aren't ready to break anything; you have to understand what you're subverting to subver it. Otherwise, you're just throwing darts blind.
It's like showing up on your first day of Spanish 1 trying to speak slang. Yes, slang is a valid form of communication to get your point across. But you don't speak Spanish, so why are you trying to immitate someone who has spent twenty years speaking it.
And this is all to say, I am not wrong about your work. Because there are no right answers. That might seem contradictory to this form letter, but to each there own. I say these things because my experience was not enjoyable, and critique is explaining your feelings. I think I don't like it for these reasons. Someone else could come along and LOVE it for the exact same reasons. But these rules exist for a reason and if I'm right (could be wrong) other people will have these same issues wether or not they can explain it.
My advice to you is to find someone unbiased who you know will give you an honest opinion and can explain that opinion in a way that makes sense to you.
thanks, I rewrote quite alot and i actually like what i wrote this time. Thanks a bunch for your help!
I'm glad it helped.
The version I read is the kind of thing I like to highlight because being a good storyteller and being a good technical writer are two seperate things. As a storyteller, you are right on the cusp of being very enjoyable to read.
If you have time... Please disregard the second half of the prologue.
There was no bright light, no mist covering the land, and no typhoons enveloping them. In just one instance, the Philippines got transported to a fantasy world. Due to the country's over-dependence on imported goods, the situation plunged them into a disaster. There was no food for everyone...
www.scribblehub.com
Would not keep reading.
This was middle of the road for me. There were things I liked, and things I didn't. Some of the technical aspects could use some polish, but it was readable.
My issues come in in terms of what we're told and what we see. And I guess what seems important as a reader. I looked at the title and said "okay, portal fantasy," But as I read, I said "ahhh alternate history". I thought you were going for something like "V for Vendetta", but no, it turns out it is a Fantasy World in the literal sense. Which is weird that we have to be told that. When you say fantasy I think of magic and mystical creatures, but what we get is a gritty story about the morality of soldiers.
That certainly could work, but it would take some cleverness. I need more grounding and better communication of information. Something like: It's played completely straight like it's the current day Phillipienes and then it turns out the "person" they need information from isn't a human and we get a line like "Yeah, the Phillipienes doesn't want to be here either" (too cheesey I know). Or just more build up, like we start out right when the Philippines gets transported.
I'm a little iffy on the en media res start, but it could work. A lot of things could work. I would just pay attention to your elements and make sure everything is related to eachother. If you're going to talk about the world building, you have to talk about it. If it's going to be a chapter about soldiers tortoring someone as society collpases, play it straight as that and end with a big punch and set up for the second chapter with the fantasy elements.
It's interesting, I'll give you that.
If you have the time, please check out mine. =]
Arthur is a noble-born reincarnator searching for absolute immortality to avoid the terrifying fate he witnessed in the afterlife. Thanks to a failed spell designed by an unimaginative ancestor, he is able to glimpse a path leading toward immortality while laying the foundations to become the...
www.scribblehub.com
You know what? Would keep reading.
There's a lot here that's either bland or overdone, but you did it well enough that I didn't mind so much. You write well, you focus on character, you keep it moving and you have some nice human details in there that make these feel like real experiences as opposed to just thing to get to the next plot beat.
Waking up late? Eh. I was more okay with it at first when it seemed like there was something wrong or mystical going on, but I guess not. Considering the second half, why not just have it a hang over so it's a character beat? Otherwise, there's really nothing else I think is worth critiquing.
Good job through the virtue of doing the same old, same old very well.
Please review this? I wrote this on a whim and am wondering if it's catchy enough. A little advice is much appreciated.
Transmigration At Its Finest
Very borderline on this one. I guess not but it's close.
I think the big take away here is that your authorial voice and personality shines through the text a lot and that goes a long way to making this work. Some of the prose isn't the best tehcnically (perfectly readable) and you don't always make the most of what's going on, but the author just seems like a fun person to hang with.
The premise, or I guess circumstances are somewhat interesting. Getting sucked into a marriage? That's fun theoretically. And even the MC's go with the flow attitude is charming. But judging this as a comedy there's nothing that was funny enough to really make me like it. The cirumcstances are funny, but you don't go that far with it. Admittedly, I'm a stickler for comedy, but it is such a subjective thing. I could see other people liking this.
Uhh, if you are ok with BL and have the time, could you please review this? Wrote on an impulse
Hoping for feedback to improve~
Puppet No.4
Thank you!
Would keep reading.
Have you played Hollow Knight? This made me think of that. Anyway, it's a very interesting first chapter. I was entertained and found the circumstances interesting straight away. You make a note about the blood and gore, and I do think you went a bit too far there to the point that it felt gratutitous. My rule about that stuff is that it's reletive. You could have much more blood and guts and whatever, so long as it's balanced out by what it's achieving.
It starts out with Puppet 4 being in a bad/dangerous spot. Love it. But past that, you keep focusing on it even when it's not adding anything new to the story. Which is, I should say, a fairly audatious way to start a BL story and I love that. So that's pretty much my advice. Either cut some of that down OR pump up other elements of the chapter to balance it out a bit more.
I would add, the Hollow Knight comparison is in your favor since I interpretted the character you're going for as a bit more wooden (heh) and less expressive. The characters aren't the highlight here, but that could work going forward if handled correctly; altough, the first chapter isn't the best place to be reserved on your characters. You do you.