Why isn't there a maximum cap on how much a single person can lobby to a party. I mean people with wealth having way more influence is a problem. So if we set a cap of 10$ as the maximum amount a single person can lobby.
(Who you lobbied for would be completely anonymous)
Parties would be forced to gain public support to run there ad campaigns instead of support of corporations.
Then you can set up single transferable vote.
The lobbying one seems kind of obvious i am just curious why i have never seen a you-tube video talking about it.
So is there a an actual reason instead of general corruption.
It would be way more effective than a cap on election spending cause it would directly decrease how much corporations have say in making of laws.
If you want to lobby for a particular law then go pay your 10 $ and you have lobbied for it. Simple and direct.
