D
Deleted member 29316
Guest
Just chill man. Enjoy the day.ok ur rite I will go read the latest The Oscillation chapter and cleanse my mind that shit isn't worth my time and anger
Just chill man. Enjoy the day.ok ur rite I will go read the latest The Oscillation chapter and cleanse my mind that shit isn't worth my time and anger
As much as people would like to deny it, harem and wish-fulfilment, if written decently and not just throwing stuff in yo face (although that also can work), is very enjoyable to read for the most of male population. It's just fun following a character that slowly gets good things happening around them. As much as I love "normal" fantasy books, I'd rather be in a mood to completely focus on it, like for example The Inheritance Cycle, The Black Magician Trilogy, or other stuff, while I can just sit and read a chapter of few of some light and quick LN, WN as I'm drinking my morning tea.
Guilty pleasures have their own merits too. Have it this way: though you consider it trash, you can't make a story as shallow as it is addictive as those you see on the trending: i.e The Man Who Hunts Monsters (didn't read that but holy shit people love it), World Keeper, among many others.I tend to disagree. It is a guilty pleasure. It might be enjoyable, but we all know it is rubbish in the end. You will never be taken seriously.
Guilty pleasures have their own merits too. Have it this way: though you consider it trash, you can't make a story as shallow as it is addictive as those you see on the trending: i.e The Man Who Hunts Monsters (didn't read that but holy shit people love it), World Keeper, among many others.
The formula is easy, but it takes a certain level of understanding and personal leeway to completely shut your brain and write the McDonald's equivalent of literature, without accounting it being the most McDonald's of all McDonald's literature.
Everyone has to start somewhere, and the more places one posts, the more feedback the author is likely to get. Have you mentioned these issues directly to the author in a constructive manner?
I too, can stick fingers into my ears and go LALALALALALALALALALALAYOUSTUPIDYOUAFOOL without giving any reasons.This is the argumentation of a fool and you know it.
I too, can stick fingers into my ears and go LALALALALALALALALALALAYOUSTUPIDYOUAFOOL without giving any reasons.
How would you know whatever you make appeals to the biggest masses? It takes a certain level of restraint to taint even a hint of individuality within a generic cash grab story. It's not "skills" in your eye, but it's certainly a craft in mine.You know yourself why. Your argument was people like it ergo it is good and requires skills to make. Is that considered elaborate reasoning these days? Maybe in your eyes.
How would you know whatever you make appeals to the biggest masses? It takes a certain level of restraint to taint even a hint of individuality within a generic cash grab story. It's not "skills" in your eye, but it's certainly a craft in mine.
The entire arguement is from a subjective standpoint. Unless you can find me a system that universally gauges the quality of all types of literature, including the craft of generic bland cash grabs, I hope you find a way out of the cinema from all that projection.You resort to subjective reasoning. That is why I called it a fool's argument. A subjective defence is no defence at all. To repeat your own words, you can stick fingers into your ears and go LALALALALALALALALALALAYOUSTUPIDYOUAFOOL without giving any reasons as much as you want.
The entire arguement is from a subjective standpoint. Unless you can find me a system that universally gauges the quality of all types of literature, including the craft of generic bland cash grabs, I hope you find a way out of the cinema from all that projection.