Are you talking about polyandry? Because that's a tag here.
No. I'm talking about not a full on flip where guys wear dresses and women grow beards, but a world where women are the ones who chase, and men are the ones who are chased. A society where men are the ones who decide if the woman gets to have sex, but the women are the ones who decide if there is going to be a relationship.
For example, in my story, nobody cares about women's breasts. They are simply not considered to be something sexual. They are just... breasts. Now, a really hot guy with his shirt off can be admired by women in our world, true, but it's not like they immediately get wet seeing a guy with his shirt off, where as if you saw a young, beautiful woman in our world with impossibly perfect, gravity defying breasts, most heterosexual males would rise to the occasion.
In Reversed Morality World, Yes, guys can admire nice breasts, but if a girl walks around with her shirt off and forgot her bra, NBD. A shirtless girl with saggy tits is basically a fat guy in our world with his shirt off. In fact, in my version, being sexual stimulated by breasts is usually a fetish for lesbians. It is right up there with being sexually stimulated by sniffing armpits or licking feet. Yes, there are people turned on by that sort of thing, but their viewed as freaks. A man being turned on by boobs is just plain bizarre.
Not that I'm kink shaming here. I try to be balanced in how I present things. If I can, I try to show the pros and cons of anything I reverse. I live by the policy, if you aren't hurting anyone, and everyone involved is a consenting ADULT, and you don't shove it in my face, go with your bad self/none of my business. I'm a firm believer in that Apathy will save the world. How many wars could have been avoided if the people involved just didn't give a shit?
But I digress.
Another example is, Instead of T&A (Tits and Ass) being what a guy likes in a girl, it's A&A (Arms and Ass) for what a girl looks in a guy. Which, BTW, is historically accurate if you look at... I want to say... Greeks/romans. But don't quote me. But it's not exposed arms, so much as arms with rolled up sleeves.
Like how a woman with shorts on isn't nearly as sexy in the 1800 as a woman who pulled her skirt up to show off her ankles. It isn't SEEING the ankles, but how the ankles are presented. The woman in shorts is definitely showing much more leg than the girl who merely hikes up her skirt enough to show off her feet, but the WAY the feet are revealed by hiking up a skirt is far more scandelous, and therefore "FORBIDDEN", thus far more arousing.
So, by the same logic:
Man with rolled up sleeves > Man in short sleeve shirt > Man in long sleeves
AM I OVERTHINKING THIS WAY TOO MUCH?
You Betcha!
But that's the whole point of this. To try and be as accurate as possible using as many real world examples as I can to properly extrapolate what sort of strange social mores would exist in the given paradigm I have established for Flip The Script.
I hope that clarifies what sort of story I am looking for. Less Gender bender, more Role Reversal.