Tempokai
Overworked One
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
- Messages
- 1,100
- Points
- 153
I read two chapters. Two chapters that want to be everything at the same time, and in doing so, they become absolutely nothing. If your doctor was also a clown, a plumber, and an anti-social jerk, would you trust them to diagnose your illness? No? Well, that’s exactly what your novel feels like. You’re out here stitching together epic muscle-sorcery fights, dystopian debt slavery, gangster brawls, political oppression, and deep philosophical musings on freedom—all while your protagonist is flexing his pecs at the audience like an unpaid OnlyFans model.Relatively new writer, just finished reading your "Dao of Rhetoric," and would love some feedback.
A Record Of A Bodybuilder's Journey To Ascension
You clearly have ideas—so many ideas, in fact, that they’re vomiting all over the page without the slightest regard for whether the reader can actually digest any of them. Your implied author—the personality behind your writing—is desperate to say everything you thought of, all at once, drowning the reader in a lore dump so aggressive it might as well be a waterboarding session. The result? Overwritten worldbuilding notes stitched together masquerading as a story.
You’ve got a world, sure. You’ve got rules, definitely. You’ve got a pseudo-gigachad protagonist who is only “pseudo” because he lacks the necessary morals, presence, or intrigue to be an actual chad. Instead, he reads like yet another discount xianxia rogue cultivator, except instead of cultivating the Dao, he’s cultivating a mountain of debt like a deadbeat parent with a gambling addiction. I should be rooting for his downfall just to see when this smug mass-hoarding wannabe collapses under the weight of his own hubris. But no, your story doesn’t persuade. It doesn’t make me want to see what happens next. It just exists, flexing at itself in the mirror, admiring its own muscles while the audience walks out of the gym in boredom.
And speaking of persuasion—you absolutely butchered it in the synopsis. A synopsis is supposed to tease the story, not dump the entire second act in my lap like an overeager fanboy at Comic-Con. When you start revealing what happens to the MC in the distant future, you’re spoiling the reader before anyone else can even get the chance to spoil it for them. You kill your own ethos, your credibility, because now I’m wondering if you have any self-restraint at all.
Then, there’s pathos. Oh, boy, it's faulty. You know this MC is an unlikeable jerk, so I'll talk about him. He's fine. Some of the best protagonists are jerks. But when you force-feed a reader his muscle mass every three paragraphs like it’s the only thing about him that matters, it gets exhausting. You said he was built like a tank in the synopsis, we got it in the opening, and yet you keep hammering it home like a gym bro who won’t shut up about his max bench. He would have been a perfect silent MC—a Gordon Freeman-type badass—if only he didn’t open his goddamn mouth.
And finally, logos—the logic of it all. Your worldbuilding is strong, I won’t deny that. But what does it matter when you’re delivering it like a college professor who assigns the entire textbook as required reading on Day 1? Instead of persuasive storytelling, you’re just infodumping everything immediately, leading to reader exhaustion. And because of that, your first and second chapter doesn’t feel like a serious, comedic, dystopian action piece—it reads like an overexaggerated satire of itself. Like someone parodying a webnovel that doesn’t exist yet.
And these are persuasion problems that stem from technical failures. Do you need all those overwrought metaphors that slow the story to a crawl? Do I need to know the MC’s debt is measured in kilograms the size of a small moon before we even get to the action? No. I came for action first, comedy second, and worldbuilding as the seasoning—not the main course drowning out everything else.
Worldbuilding is context. And you don’t need this much context for either jokes or plot progression to happen. Your story should be persuading me to keep reading—but instead, it’s standing in front of a mirror, admiring its own reflection, flexing endlessly, while the audience quietly leaves the room because the story keeps flexing the worldbuilding muscles only it admires.
I expected persuasive worldbuilding because you’ve read my anti-guide on rhetoric. I thought you understood the art of making people care, even a little bit. But instead, I found this.
And it’s meh.