Snusmumriken
Vagabond and traveller
- Joined
- May 22, 2021
- Messages
- 449
- Points
- 103
I never said that you have to do it all the time. in fact, I specifically stated that it depends. Obviously short children's stories would rely on quicker and more direct telling exactly because the reader audience might not even be ready yet to pick up on general cues quickly enough to characterize these themselves.This is true, but even this depends on the story, genre, tone and length. For example, the book series Animorphs was fantastic with characterisation and very immersive, but every book would start with a couple of pages where the characters meet up and the POV character straightup tells us who's the funny-but-ruthless one, who's the violent-but-conflicted one, who's the red-tailed hawk/bully magnet with depression, etc., and this was the correct choice for the series. Applegate could pull it off because a) it wasn't inconsistent with what was shown later (the smart guy tended to make the smart decisions, the moral treehugger tended to question the morality of their actions, etc.), and b) it was an action series and we had like 90 pages to tell an action story, with absolutely no guarantee that the reader had read any of the previous stories in the 60-ish-book series. So a straightforward, explicit explanation of "here is everyone's relationships and primary character traits" thrown in with the general explanation of the ongoing alien war made perfect sense in that context.
In the majority of cases, if you're dithering between 'showing' and 'telling' something, the correct choice is usually to not be lazy and to 'show'. But there are situations where 'tell' is the right way to go for just about anything, even things where 'show' is the correct choice 99% of the time.
But most of the people here are writing large if not huge stories geared toward a much more mature audience.