BenJepheneT
Light Up Gold - Parquet Courts
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
- Messages
- 5,344
- Points
- 233
There's a thought experiment out there called the Ship of Thesus. Basically, if the a particular ship were to be kept in a harbor and every part on the ship were replaced one at a time, would it then be a new ship?
My dilemma comes not from the aforementioned question, but the follow-up question: if all the removed pieces from the original ship were to be reassembled to form a new ship, would that be the ship of Theseus?
Now that we've established the context, here's where my question lies: if were to molecularly rearrange a buff dude to become a voluptuous chick, would it be gay to date her?
You're essentially going out with a woman whose every part of her belongs to a guy. The organism may take shape of a lady, and may perform functions specific to that sex, but the fact of the matter remains that said organism is simply molecularly rearranged from that of someone with swinging cock and balls, just that those cells moved up to her C-cup tiddies instead.
If it IS gay, then what says about the rest of us? Are we susceptible to hold a 50% risk of gay, since at a physically hypothetical level, we could all be chicks and dudes at the same time? Call it Schroedinger's Homosexuality, if so.
My dilemma comes not from the aforementioned question, but the follow-up question: if all the removed pieces from the original ship were to be reassembled to form a new ship, would that be the ship of Theseus?
Now that we've established the context, here's where my question lies: if were to molecularly rearrange a buff dude to become a voluptuous chick, would it be gay to date her?
You're essentially going out with a woman whose every part of her belongs to a guy. The organism may take shape of a lady, and may perform functions specific to that sex, but the fact of the matter remains that said organism is simply molecularly rearranged from that of someone with swinging cock and balls, just that those cells moved up to her C-cup tiddies instead.
If it IS gay, then what says about the rest of us? Are we susceptible to hold a 50% risk of gay, since at a physically hypothetical level, we could all be chicks and dudes at the same time? Call it Schroedinger's Homosexuality, if so.