Rejected from Royal Road for a "sexual cover," now posting on Scribble Hub

Corty

Corty

Sneaking in, stealing your socks.
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
2,419
Points
128
Mikan_Citrus said:
Okay, so the the mods at RR responded again...

Support Ticket Images:

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 2

Screenshot 3

Screenshot 4

Yeah... I get the feeling these clowns don't even know how to run their own site, they are totally unaware of what's even being posted there. They even admitted themselves that they only manually approve submissions during the initial vetting, but after that they clearly don't even bother to look into it since the authors just change the covers after getting approved lmao. What a pain in the neck, unless you're a total prude with the cover it seems like you'll just get rejected regardless as of late. However, it's "okay" if you edit the cover after the fact—duly noted.

I have a feeling they'll just get even stricter though after my appeals with my work lol.

Uh oh
Click to expand...
Upload it without a cover, then add a lewd one, got it mods, thx for the tip.

Lolz. Of course, it is because of ads. Scrubs. We had covers rejected here, too, but those were near to showing private parts or truly suggestive. So... lolz.
 
SailusGebel

SailusGebel

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
9,493
Points
233
georgelee5786 said:
Two choices for writing sites.

SH, where lewdness is rampant

RR, where lewdness is treated like radioactive waste.
Click to expand...
WEBNOVEL!
 
Generic.Archdemon

Generic.Archdemon

‎
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
947
Points
133
That being said, fair play for RR for trying to be consistent.

Personally, I got no issues if its a "does what it said on the tin situation".

RR be RR. and it be like that sometimes, all the times. :sweating_profusely:
 
Mikan_Citrus

Mikan_Citrus

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2024
Messages
25
Points
13


Wasn't really sure what else to say since I pretty much got the message that RR is bending over for advertisements, so I just brought up one of their earliest works and most popular works that by their current policies, would be considered as a "sexual cover."
Sabruness said:
just to throw extra 'lolwut?' on the haphazard moderating of RR, i present to you the cover of Everybody Loves Large Chests which is more sexualized than OP's cover (though has been around for many years)

Click to expand...
the cover of the work I linked to is this
 
SailusGebel

SailusGebel

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
9,493
Points
233
Mikan_Citrus said:


Wasn't really sure what else to say since I pretty much got the message that RR is bending over for advertisements, so I just brought up one of their earliest works and most popular works that by their current policies, would be considered as a "sexual cover."

the cover of the work I linked to is this
Click to expand...
I smell a ban, baby
I smell a ban, baby
You’d better watch out
I smell a ban
 
Corty

Corty

Sneaking in, stealing your socks.
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
2,419
Points
128
Mikan_Citrus said:


Wasn't really sure what else to say since I pretty much got the message that RR is bending over for advertisements, so I just brought up one of their earliest works and most popular works that by their current policies, would be considered as a "sexual cover."

the cover of the work I linked to is this
Click to expand...
Prepare for a ban. :blobrofl:
 
Corty

Corty

Sneaking in, stealing your socks.
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
2,419
Points
128
+ the other work's title. Everybody Loves Large Chests.

Ahhh... the sweet smell of hypocrites. It's like being back in 'nam. :blob_salute:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top