I mean let us be honest here, you are judging WN, not quality literature. The benchmark is almost non-existent. Just let the guy write whatever shit he wants to I guess. Just like there are writers who write such things, there are bound to be readers for it (unless it is god awful terrible.) Well, it is at least constructive feedback.
I'm not trying to discourage anyone from writing. I only review people who want in depth critique, so they literally asked for it. If someone wants to get better at writing it's meant to be a useful tool to do so since those tools don't otherwise exist in these communities.