New Years Battle: Humans vs Vampires (Humans Win)

[RepresentingEnvy]

You're a reactionary atheist then.
Not a true one.

Well, yea, it's not like anybody knows for sure.

 

[Anon2024]

Well, yea, it's not like anybody knows for sure.

Only a true atheist will fully make a claim that there is no higher power.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

Well, yea, it's not like anybody knows for sure.

I think the eye witnesses knew.

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

I think the eye witnesses knew.

Eye witness testimony means little. People have said they saw all sorts of stuff.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

Eye witness testimony means little. People have said they saw all sorts of stuff.

Good luck believing anything from anyone, then.

 

[prognastat]

Only a true atheist will fully make a claim that there is no higher power.

Technically not a true Atheist but a Gnostic Atheist. A regular atheist would be anyone that doesn't believe god exists. Being a gnostic one would be claiming you knew god didn't exist.

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

Good luck believing anything from anyone, then.

This is the exact reason I usually stay out of these discussions.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

This is the exact reason I usually stay out of these discussions.

Because you don't believe anyone or because of the response to that?

 

[Anon2024]

Eye witness testimony means little. People have said they saw all sorts of stuff.

If I ever see a real vampire, I wouldn’t tell anyone because no one would believe me.

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

Because you don't believe anyone or because of the response to that?

The response. It's also why I think debating is silly.

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

The response. It's also why I think debating is silly.

Well, if that's the stance you take you aren't participating in debate, you aren't putting forth your own ideas. Only denial in others.

 

[Anon2024]

The response. It's also why I think debating is silly.

No one has proof of anything. It’s mostly anecdotal.

Well, if that's the stance you take you aren't participating in debate, you aren't putting forth your own ideas. Only denial in others.

Debates are dependent on commonality along with facts and evidence. A philosophical debate often goes nowhere because it’s based on the intangible.

Existence of God is a philosophical debate because it cannot be tested in a lab. Same with theoretical theories like Evolution and climate change? It’s all currently useless to debate since most of it is philosophical.

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

Well, if that's the stance you take you aren't participating in debate, you aren't putting forth your own ideas. Only denial in others.

-_-

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

-_-

Anon?

 

[TsuruI_am_a_bot]

vs

vs

Male vers.

VS

VS

 

[Prince_Azmiran_Myrian]

It's more along the lines of, 'as long as you're not hurting anyone else, stay in your lane and be fine with it.' Other than that, I don't see the point in trying to get someone else to think like you do. I get that a lot of 'christians' do that, but the Bible is clear on this too.

Matthew 10:14-16 - And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.

So yeah, that's kind of a diss lol, but it's not meant to be since you don't believe in a day of judgement anyway. Still, Christians shouldn't try to force those who don't want to hear it, to hear it, I agree with that.

I see this as a weaker argument against public proselytizing, If we were to follow this then we could never do this publicly since there are always people who don't want to hear it. But I am learning.
These verses I am considering recently: Proverbs 9:7-9 , Proverbs 26:11, or Matthew 7:6, peter 3:15-16

 

[Voidiris]

Only a true atheist will fully make a claim that there is no higher power.

A atheist is someone who doesn't believe in a god, but that's too a form of atheism.

 

[Anon2024]

I see this as a weaker argument against public proselytizing, If we were to follow this then we could never do this publicly since there are always people who don't want to hear it. But I am learning.
These verses I am considering recently: Proverbs 9:7-9 , Proverbs 26:11, or Matthew 7:6, peter 3:15-16

Nothing to do with what you’re saying. There is a difference between debating and encouraging.

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

Well, if that's the stance you take you aren't participating in debate, you aren't putting forth your own ideas. Only denial in others.

It's because it's exhausting, and no one listens to each other anyway. Why do you think most of my responses in the forums are short?

 

[Shrimp_eater]

Well, I was more agnostic, but Christians make me more atheistic, I guess. It's just preachy stuff that turns me off of it so hard. It's like Story_Marc just said in his video: preaching only works for those who already believe what you say.

Become a believer of touhoism, we have vampires