This reads like the review of someone who writes a lot of reviews, but doesn't want to admit that they have read the novel and not understood it. So they just leave three stars and leave.
RR is pretty awful. I used to be on there and was considered fairly big but left after seeing all the hypocrisy and strange ideas of writers common sense.
@Assurbanipal_II They are not picky. Just give them LitRPG with cool\edgy MC, give your MC weakness that isn't an actual weakness, and you are ready to get tons of views and positive reviews.
@Hans.Trondheim Yep, it's an old story, so I don't want to repeat myself. However I can add something new to this. Recently I was going through greyblob's WN recommendations, and it's mostly RR novels. RR ads were almost always showing LitRPG. I saw like 20 ads for LitRPG stories, and maybe 2-3 non-LitRPG. It's absolutely hillarious.
D
Deleted member 54065
Eh, says a lot about their biases.
Any case, it's futile to argue with stupid, so yeah...hope you have your revenge A2.
Even bad publicity is publicity. It is not about revenge, but it stings a little how the big LitRPGs are seemingly under so much less scrutiny. And I get the hefty critics.
@Hans.Trondheim Okay, you forced me to do this. I had a review that consisted solely of the phrase "NTR IS DISGUSTING." It was like 3-4 paragraphs long and it stayed up for like a year or so. Obviously I didn't delete this review and let it be. And it tells a lot on how good RR moderation is and how good of a readers they are if it was up for a year.
"Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large groups."
A simple read of the description would've save them the trouble.