I don't know anything about that person besides this single comment, so I do not know what they consider a convincing reason, but I couldn't see myself writing this to a stranger and thinking it'd actually change something for them. Which would make posting it little more than a nuisance to the recipient.
Though I won't call it a nuisance, I do agree that there's no way anyone would have just listen to the commenter. So for me, I'll call it – a brave but ineffective thing to do.
You compared doravg's complaint to LGBT+, my point was intended to be that even if both are fundamentally demands for the other to change to your values, I believe that there is significance in what degree of change is demanded, and to what end, irrespective of the means, rhetorical or physical, employed to achieve it.
Fair enough. What you are saying is that other than the method of how someone shares their belief (so violent or not). The demand that is required in order to change (so how much it changes one's life) is also included. Good point.
So our main differences is the fact that I do not consider the 'significance in what degree of change is demanded' as something of a heavy variable, so roughly 8:2 in terms of variable of method and variable of demand, while for you, you consider them roughly equal in terms of weight, so maybe 5:5.
What matters is that I do not put the weight of that variable as much as you.
And because of that, you consider the comment as... actually idk what you think of that comment.... Harmful? Offensive? Stupid? Anyway, although I still think it is completely harmless, I'll respect yours.
However, that doesn't change my mind that the way the OP reacted is simply excessive, all OP needed to do was answer plainly or just ignore the commenter. Making a thread talking about it was unnecessary. Imagine yourself trying to share your belief only to be met with this kind of response. You really think they deserve it?
If you genuinely think the OP's response was fair.... then let's agree to disagree.