Alseki.
Laurant Writing Romans.
- Joined
- May 19, 2023
- Messages
- 152
- Points
- 63
I have had multiple suggestions, and it does sound like a good idea, but I am conflicted.
My reasoning against Glossary is the same as I have against Summary.
I don't want to reveal information about the story before the reader reads the story, I don't want them having pre-conceived and ill-informed opinions that may hamper their experience in the future.
I want them to experience the story as raw as possible. While it is possible to spin the summary in a way that would benefit the author, I don't reckon I am capable of writing such a summary without giving at least a little misinformation or without showing something major.
I have read many books where the summary is straight up a lie, in fact rarely do books have a completely true summary.
Same with glossary. A glossary would give information about certain things ahead of my intended time.
So, should I have one? How should I go about making it?
My reasoning against Glossary is the same as I have against Summary.
I don't want to reveal information about the story before the reader reads the story, I don't want them having pre-conceived and ill-informed opinions that may hamper their experience in the future.
I want them to experience the story as raw as possible. While it is possible to spin the summary in a way that would benefit the author, I don't reckon I am capable of writing such a summary without giving at least a little misinformation or without showing something major.
I have read many books where the summary is straight up a lie, in fact rarely do books have a completely true summary.
Same with glossary. A glossary would give information about certain things ahead of my intended time.
So, should I have one? How should I go about making it?