Idiot plot or realistic plot, pros and cons

[Paul_Tromba]

Have you ever written, or read, a story where all the characters are just dumb enough to slow the progression of the plot, as whatever problem they face would be solved instantly if they were smarter? This is known as an Idiot Plot. The exact definition is "Any plot containing problems that would be solved instantly if all the characters were not idiots."

Because of how easy it is to write an idiot plot, I tried practicing with idiot plots. However, I tried not to make any of the characters obviously dumb. This somehow alters things just enough to somehow make a plot with realistic progression. The reader is learning everything along with the characters without any issues. How this happens? I don't know. I just want to make a bunch of chaotic dumbasses but instead all I do is make somewhat rational chaotic neutral characters.

Anyways, I digress. What are your thoughts on idiot plots and realistic plots in terms of writing and reading? Do you enjoy writing either of them and is it difficult or easy? Which is more fun or interesting to read. Would you rather have a wacky idiot Plot or a more realistic steady plot?

 

[Corty]

Where is the option for both?

Both are fun for both reading and writing purposes. But they need to be intentional. I don't like it when a serious plot comes off idiotic and vice versa.

Although reading an idiotic plot that the characters take seriously, yet the narrator ensures that we know it is for comedic purposes, is great fun.

 

[CrimsonGenius]

I consider any horror movie to be that idiot plot. Don’t go down that hallway, don’t split up, chop Micheal meyers head off and mail it to France.

 

[Paul_Tromba]

Where is the option for both?

Both are fun for both reading and writing purposes. But they need to be intentional. I don't like it when a serious plot comes off idiotic and vice versa.

Although reading an idiotic plot that the characters take seriously, yet the narrator ensures that we know it is for comedic purposes, is great fun.

I added it at the bottom but option 2 was both. Though that is a good point.

 

[SailusGebel]

I don't like reading idiotic plot, but I can tolerate it if it's not overly dumb. I hope I do not write idiotic plots, and never will.

 

[beast_regards]

Why we couldn't have idiot plot?

If the character should have flaws, why said flaws could be made either stupid, but at least less than optimal decision? It's a weakness, a character flaw. Isn't that what we are supposed to do?

Even considering the ever popular LitRPG, aren't dimwitted barbarians and even other character classes a part of every optimal RPG builds?

How many characters in the D&D have intelligence of 8 or so, when 10 is the average?

 

[DJ_Rhaposdy]

I like shenanigans. Shenanigans created by idiots are more fun to read, than write, though.

 

[georgelee5786]

They're alright but I don't seek them out

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

I like them. I write them, and I read them. To be fair, most plots will be idiot plots because an author is not omniscient.

 

[2wordsperminute]

I dislike the idea of them. But let's be honest, most games of D&D are just idiot plots. And those are pretty enjoyable.