Is it still "surf & turf" without the "surf"?

Is it still "surf & turf" without the "surf"?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

wimbledon

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2022
Messages
52
Points
33
"Surf" is associated with the ocean. Is a meal still considered surf 'n turf if the surf component is not from the ocean (ie. lake/river fish)?
 

HelloHound

Hound of hell, lover of girls
Joined
Mar 30, 2022
Messages
1,225
Points
153
it's fish n steak, I don't think people are going to nitpick that much
 

Stealthy_Enigma

(❀⁠≽ᆺ≼)⊃~~~~✧ ꧁Floofy Ninja!!!꧂
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
Messages
274
Points
108
Woops, misread the question.
˝<(✿>///<)>˝
/\˝/˙˙˙⊃⊂\ *blushes*


As for the food part, fish is fish- however, I have never had much in terms of seafood due to where I live, so I wouldn't be able to tell the difference that much.

On another note, I have had the chance to try different types of river and lake fish, and can say they taste quite different from tuna, and also from each other~
 
Last edited:

Stealthy_Enigma

(❀⁠≽ᆺ≼)⊃~~~~✧ ꧁Floofy Ninja!!!꧂
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
Messages
274
Points
108
After looking up exactly what Surf & Turf is, seeing that it is usually made with steak and shrimp/lobster, I will definitely say there will be a noticeable difference in the flavor.

River/lake fish will be a little more bland, for lack of a better word, than the sea critters~
 
Last edited:

Paul_Tromba

Sleep deprived mess of a published author
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Messages
4,326
Points
183
There needs to be surf and turf, plains and islands, water and fields.
 
Top