Porn Awareness Month R-18

[ElliePorter]

 

[RepresentingEnvy]

View attachment 23415

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

View attachment 23415

Why are you so suspicious

 

[Anon2024]

View attachment 23415

It’s just a perfectly normal chest.

 

[Voidiris]

View attachment 23415

Is there something wrong with it?

 

[SailusGebel]

Wait a second... This isn't a thread where OP shares new porn with us? What a fucking clickbait.

 

[owotrucked]

The truth is hyperbolic, one-sided and closed minded.

And I can can go even further with this "thesis paper" so stay toned.

Scientifics do claim some cold, hard, close-minded truths, but they tend to be very small scope and worded with great care and without ambiguity.

For instance, "porn is good/bad" is a subjective judgement that has very broad scope.
Whereas "porn and masturbation have adverse effects on psychological and physical health" has a smaller scope and easier to support or debunk: The topic of neurological drawback of porn has already been discussed, but for men you can mention that semen production is a resource consumming process that diverts nutrient, minerals, and vitamins away from things like growth or immune system (btw in animal kingdom mothers produce less antibodies because milk production takes resources). Such wording has also the great benefit of not needing to adress 'positive' effects or function of porn if there are any.

Spreading awareness about demerits of porn is a good thing, and suggesting tools like easypeasy is commendable, but that's the limit of the scope you can tackle with just the subject of "porn's adverse effects".

If you carelessly tread on broader subject like "everyone should inconditionnally stop porn", you'll need to address a lot more subjects like addiction in general. One thing of note, is that even knowing drug's adverse effects, society still gladly engage in them. So actually, "you should stop porn because it's bad" isn't even relevant. Pleasure seeking behavior and outlets fulfill psychological 'functions', so their unhealthiness is irrelevant when it comes to the individual's decision making.

On another note, while there are small pieces of universal truth, they aren't enough to navigate the world. If that was the case, then instincts would be the only thing we'd need, since instincts are sets of hyperbolic, one-sided, close minded rules that triggers with our pattern recognition. But the human species gained rationality through natural selection. So, it's safe to assume that there is an evolutionary benefit to use rationality to study and adapt to situations with a higher level of granularity. In other words, don't be satisfied with just general universal close-minded rules, don't give up on using your head to take in more details to see the world with higher accuracy. Absolute confidence in your judgement means you are about to stop using your head.

btw, easypeasy claims a ridiculous success rate like >80% iirc, how much do you believe it? And how reliable do you think the author's testing protocol was? like is it scientific quality like blind test, and no cherry picking, or just ass pull?

 

[Anon2024]

You should stop porn so demand for hentai will go up and we will have better hentai.

 

[SailusGebel]

You should stop porn so demand for hentai will go up and we will have better hentai.

anon wants that NTR hentai

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

You should stop porn so demand for hentai will go up and we will have better hentai.

Hentai is a form of porn you know. But the only thing that I would say that its better than real pornography is that it doesn't directly contribute to the monetization of human trafficking. Though the issue with hentai is that its porn at the end of the day, and the fact that it is more imaginary and can play with the mind even more compared to real pornography. Hentai has like more extreme plot points and it encourages pedophilia through lolis and shotas.

 

[CubicleHermit]

My response:

(It's funnier that this only has the original broadway version with Russian subs.)

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

My response:

(It's funnier that this only has the original broadway version with Russian subs.)

Its even more disgusting considering that the traditional symbol for childhood innocence and a primary means of communicating lessons to children, the existence of the play doll would be corrupted to such means.

 

[Voidiris]

Its even more disgusting considering that the traditional symbol for childhood innocence and a primary means of communicating lessons to children, the existence of the play doll would be corrupted to such means. View attachment 23449

That's a matter of course.

 

[CubicleHermit]

Its even more disgusting considering that the traditional symbol for childhood innocence and a primary means of communicating lessons to children, the existence of the play doll would be corrupted to such means.

If you don't like porn, don't watch it/read it/write it/perform in it.

If you're offended/disgusted by a discussion of it done in a barely-R-rated comedic song,

Another good song about it, this one PG:

"I do have a cause, though; it is obscenity. I'm for it." (intro to Smut, by Tom Lehrer)

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

If you don't like porn, don't watch it/read it/write it/perform in it.

Refraining from it's existence still means that other swill have to suffer as a result of its injustices. I am not an individualist, because I am a Collectivist and that is the will of God and I cannot bare see anyone suffer under the slaveries of pornography

If you're offended/disgusted by a discussion of it done in a barely-R-rated comedic song,

It shouldn't be done at all.

 

[CubicleHermit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

This isn't satirical or extremist though. Nearly every person alive before 1980 would support this view

 

[CubicleHermit]

This isn't satirical or extremist though. Nearly every person alive before 1980 would support this view

I think you're off by at least 25 years. That Tom Lehrer song was first recorded in 1964, and the main supreme court decision was 1957: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

"As the judge remarked the day that he acquitted my Aunt Hortense, 'To be smut, it must be utterly without redeeming social importance.'"

Also, given that there was plenty of porn all the way to the distant past (written and drawn... photos being a recent invention) I think you vastly over-estimate how prudish the past was.

I wasn't around for enough of the 1970s to remember it, but what I heard about the mainstreaming of porn in that decade is very surprising to those of us who grew up with it in private on VHS or the younger sorts who know it mostly online.

 

[Ilikewaterkusa]

I think you're off by at least 25 years. That Tom Lehrer song was first recorded in 1964, and the main supreme court decision was 1957: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

"As the judge remarked the day that he acquitted my Aunt Hortense, 'To be smut, it must be utterly without redeeming social importance.'"

Also, given that there was plenty of porn all the way to the distant past (written and drawn... photos being a recent invention) I think you vastly over-estimate how prudish the past was.

I wasn't around for enough of the 1970s to remember it, but what I heard about the mainstreaming of porn in that decade is very surprising to those of us who grew up with it in private on VHS or the younger sorts who know it mostly online.

Yeah porn existed back then and it was gaining traction and popularity but it was still despised by the majority of westerners. And the past was still prudish despite the wide spread nature of pornography. And pornography has definitely evolved a lot from polaroid pictures of tits and VHS tapes as it is effectively omnipresent and far more addictive due to decades of psychological wiring and the creation of new genres and lies such as "amateur" pornography being safe porn

 

[CubicleHermit]

Still a case of

if the latter, a place that hosts a lot of rather smutty stories is maybe not the best place to be pushing for your particular ideology.