Personally, I think successful results would be the best end product. However, changes need to be things that improve the narrative.
For example, the ready player one movie starts out with a race scene that doesn't appear in the book. The first arc of that book was mostly a scrappy scrubby socially awkward guy who can only confidently talk about 80s pop culture with his one friend. The first Easter egg isn't found by accident. An bunch of research and understanding of the Oasis staff's history needed to figure it out.
In the book this is the turning point for the MC to start getting sponsorships so he can get out of extreme poverty. In the movie it comes across like he stumbled into success. I'm not sure that a change like that is an improvement on the narrative.
That is a bad example. A good example would be the Silent Hill move. The game is about a father looking for his daughter. In the movie it is about a mother looking for her daughter. Considering the premise of the game and the plot a female main character fits quite nicely.