What I'm saying is that the 2 are inseparable. If you answer 3rd person, do you mean 3rd person objective or omnicient?
What I'm saying is that this poll is insufficient as it is. If we only answer one, then it's missing details.
If you were going to ask the question, either combine the options or leave out the objective/omniscient part of the equation all together. Or, leave out the 1st, 2nd, 3rd POV part.
If you are not going to combine them, then don't have them all on the same poll. It's meaningless if they're not combined.
Alright, let’s me clarify.
1st person POV = 1st person limited (The character is a narrator, and we only get to know their thought.)
2nd person POV = What you mostly find in interactive stories.
3rd person POV = 3rd person limited (The narrator tells the story, and we only get to know the POV’s character’s thought.)
Omniscient POV = The narrator knows everything and can get into every characters’ head.
Objective POV = The narrator is just a mere observer, and cannot get into any character‘s head.
———
I included omniscient and objective because it can stand on its own. So I totally disagree with you saying it’s inseparable.
Actually, the omniscient and objective POVs can even be considered 3rd person POV, as it‘s mostly written that way.
But, like I said, it can stand on its own. 3rd person POV isn’t the same thing as omniscient or objective POVs. (When I say 3rd person POV, I mean 3rd person limited, which is just one of the POVs.)
———
And, if I go by your example, then it will be too complicated. Your example isn’t even completed in the first place.
Let’s see; 1st person omniscient? And 1st person objective? Wait, where the hell is 1st person limited then? Sure enough, you didn’t mix it up with any of those two, right?
———
Now, I hope that makes things clear for you. And also, I don’t see anyone complaining right now, so I don’t think it’s that much of a problem.
Still, thanks for your advice, though.