For purpose I mean her intended role in the story.
I showed your answer to my wife. Her response was, "I can't be bothered to make a new account. Tell him to kick himself in the balls."
AHEM.
Please kick yourself in the balls.
I will attempt to clairify my wife's objection to your post as well as add my own.
For example, sexual violence will always be a threat.
Sexual violence is always a threat for everyone. If you go by lifetime stats, it's about 50/50. If a woman wants to avoid sexual violence, you can improve your chances by 50% by never drinking alcohol. Avoiding men who drink alcohol will improve it to about 80%. However, for men, it is alcohol, but also YOUTH and criminals. Men tend to get sexual assaulted while they are young and/or involved in felony level crimes.
Otherwise, being a woman in modern society is great, violence wise. A man is about 9 times more likely to be a victim of any give crime.
Being dismissed for being a woman will always be a thing.
Citation needed. I get dismissed ALL THE GOD DAMN TIME. In fact, when I bring up a suggestion, it is almost always rejected, EVEN IF I'M RIGHT. I got an IQ of 146. I helped invent the third most popular theory of quantum gravity. I changed federal law on a goddamn monthly basis. Thanks to my wife's illness, I have learned more about pulmonary diseases than most experts in the North East of America. I am by every metric a genius, and when I point out the OBVIOUS TREATMENT FOR THE CLIENTS, the nurse will automatically ignore my suggestion, until MONTHS LATER when she will try it and find out I was right, but by then, she forgot.
And I suspect it is because her hair is dyed an unnatural color and I happen to be white, male, and 50. No proof, because, you know, THERE ARE NO OTHER WHITE, MALES at my job anymore. Used to be the majority 10 years ago, now they all either quit, or got fired.
Uh... Not saying jet fuel melts steel beams, but you know... 2+2=...
People in power dismissing others is the NORM for EVERYONE. A woman THINKING that this is common to only women? Now that's a female trait.
Being underestimated for being a woman will always be a thing.
If you saw me, and knew my job was Professional Ass-Wiper, I doubt you would suspect that my hobby involves figuring out how gravity works on a quantum level. Underestimation isn't just a woman thing.
Being harassed will always be a thing.
Now there we have an actually difference. Because in most societies, women are NOT the ones to start the courtship process. However, we have redefined Harassment to mean, 'HE IS UNATTRACTIVE AND I DIDN'T WANT HIM HITTING ON ME.' A man approaching you ONCE and trying to start up a conversation is not harassment.
However, if he has the three sixes (Six Foot Tall, Six Figure Salary, Six Inch Dick), it is NOT harassment.
Side note, men do get harassed, but only about 20% of the male population. And because society does not recognize that men can be harassed, it goes undocumented.
Other side note: Until 2012, it was not legally possible for an adult male in the US to be raped by a woman. before that, it was only sexual assault.
For personality I mean, men and women face different challenges in real life, and most men are unaware of the difficulties women face, or we simply don't care.
And you can say the same in reverse. This is not a female only problem.
We might think of being cat-called on the street as some minor nuance for us men, but for women, that's a big deal.
Okay. I have been catcalled. By women. Screaming out of a car that they loved my ass. ON A BUSY STREET. Like four of them.
Oh. I did not complain.
If you actual go into the studies of catcalling, you will find that it is in declined and no longer socially acceptable to the point of almost non-existence. Furthermore, we run into the harassment issue of 'When it is a man I am attracted to, it is not harassment.' In fact, if you breech the issue with women, you will find about about forty they MISS BEING CATCALLED. This is a non-issue and to even bring it up is to just bring up stereotypes.
Dude. DO YOUR RESEARCH. You are a WRITER FOR FUCK'S SAKE! You have a DUTY to be as factually accurate as possible. Anything else is propaganda.
We might not care about what our bosses think of us but for women, that's a big deal.
Women care about society in general more than men. Women are much more likely to judge their self-esteem on the opinion of others. However, I find it odd you are singling out 'bosses'.
We usually think that men are rational and women are emotional and that's usually right but the way women think is entirely different than our way of thinking.
No. Men are monotaskers, women multitaskers.
If you do a typical IQ test, men, on average are 'smarter' than women. (as if IQ tests worked)
However, they did a study where they took the questions and broke them up so it was basically random. It wasn't all math questions, all spacial questions, all word questions in order, but they broke it up so you had to constantly jump back and forth between multiple pages while keeping track of multiple questions at the same time.
Now, since an IQ test is on a sliding scale, it shouldn't matter. the average IQ is 100, because that's what you make the average score on a test. It is always 100. So, IQs for men and women should, percentage wise, be the same.
Men and women's IQ scores were equal.
Now, one can imply that men are still smarter, but I think that there are other factors at play. I do not hold much stock in IQ tests in general. As I said. I got a 146 and I'm a fuckin idiot. It's a good tool for looking at groups, not individuals or making inferances.
That said, Women are clearly better at handling more than one task at a time.
Men on the other hand handle one task at a time. BEING EMOTIONAL IS A TASK. We are not good at being upset and performing an action. A woman has no problem being pissed and doing something. Men don't do that. If we are angry it disrupts our ability to focus on a task, whereas women seem to have no problem
It leads to the issue where women think men think like women. They don't understand why we cannot FEEL and DO. That's not in the brain's architecture. And so, it leads to misunderstandings like, 'Men have no feelings'. No. It's just when we do FEEL, it is the only thing we will be doing.
And often it completely blindsides women. A woman experiencing a man who is JUST FEELING, especially when it is a negative one, is usually scared, and often afterwords wants to end the relationship. A man sobbing/crying in front of a woman results in her opinion of him dropping to half of previous scores. I'm skipping over much of the nuance here, but these are the broad strokes.
Socializing is a big deal. Interpersonal relations are a big deal. Men simply don't care what others think about them, a woman does, and for a long time, it was crucial to her survival.
Broad strokes, true.
Even their sexual desire is different! Women are constantly thinking about that just like men, even if they aren't interested in anyone.
Broad strokes, true.
They might be virgins but the thought is always there, and unlike virgin men, society adores virgin women.
Ehhh... I don't have time to explain this. No. Just... myth.
Remember, men go after as many women as they can, and women find that attractive.
Myth.
Women go after the very best man they can find, and men find that attractive.
Sort of.
Women that go after many men are "SLUTS".
Sort of.
Men that go after only one woman are "SIMPS".
Dude. EVERY MAN IS A SIMP. What people label simp is baseline male. Jeeze. Simp is a term being used to shame males into not spending money on the WRONG women.
You don't have to focus on that but a writer can use that to create conflict, maybe society is constantly reminding your female protagonist that she hasn't married yet,
Depends on the society. Certainly not a modern one.