Ai-chan
Queen of Yuri Devourer of Traps
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,413
- Points
- 153
Eh, there is no better or worse. They have different strengths and weaknesses. Some people write better in first person, others write better as 3rd person. It's all individual preference.Which one is better and why
In first person, the author allows the readers to go straight into that protagonist's psyche. The readers feel everything the protagonist feels, every tactile sensation, every overpowering emotions and every misguided motivations are all laid bare to the readers, in a way as if the reader is playing psychoanalysis with the protagonist. If you can't feel this, then it simply means the author sucks. The strength of 1st person is that the readers are inside the protagonist, if not the protagonist itself.
Consider the following sentence, "I... I do not know what to do. What must I do? Someone, won't someone tell me what I should do now?"
In third person, the author gives an impersonal view on the target characters. While you can give descriptions and expand the protagonist's monologues as you would in 1st person, the feeling of closeness to the protagonist is not there. You feel like you're a god looking down on the person, not being the person itself.
Consider the following sentence, "He fell to his knees, his mind confused. He didn't know what to do. He begged for help, but none answered his call."
The difference between 1st and 3rd person is that 1st person puts you in the protagonist's shoes, while 3rd person puts you way above the clouds. In google map term, 3rd person is like typing the words 'Downtown Detroit' and looking at the area from above, while 1st person is clicking the street view and coming face to face with a house robbery just off Bagley Street. It's definitely not the same feeling. You can see the forest under 3rd person, but only under 1st person can you see the shrubbery under a particular pine tree marked with a big X.