TheTrinary
Hi, I'm Stephen
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Messages
- 994
- Points
- 133
RATING: Would not Keep ReadingHey! I really did appreciate your honest and helpful feedback on my first story a couple of months ago. I've just started a sequel and now have a completed first chapter. I'd be most grateful for your insight, suggestions or general feedback on any improvement I could do to it.
GENERALLY
I really want to analyze the opening paragraph, so I'll just comment on things generally. It's very long and over written. Several pages in, I wasn't sure what the point of anything was. There is little to no characterization of the two characters or the enviroment. I guess you could say I didn't get it:
What is the characters relationship? How does the literal action on screen change or stress that dynamic? Between the start and them getting home, does anything of substance happen.
For example, the Dad seems to be a bit of a dick. What if we're told they have to get home before it gets dark or they might be in trouble with Dad. And then the little one getting stuck stresses their purpose. And you can weave some ominous anticipation about the dad.
LINE EDIT
The bare trees in the neighbourhood of Lawrence Avenue groaned and swayed in a bitterly chilly winter wind on the first afternoon of January. This is a poorly written sentnece. Gramatically it's fine, but there is no hierachy to the information. The writer seemingly wants to convey that there are trees in wind, it's winter, and it's January. No one of these facts seems more or less important than the other and there is no real logic why they would be put into the sentence like this. You could essentiall arrange any random three facts and it wouldn't change much. Pick the hero idea, and everything else supports it. If you want to describe trees, don't pull up a calendar to do so.
The sound of the trees was momentarily drowned out by a dull rattle and clatter. Fun sound and meter, but you aren't saying anything. I have no idea what you're describing as a reader.
A slightly chubby eight year old boy in a puffy blue coat and smooth winter trousers trundled along the tarmac path astride a small red bike, with metal brackets and small plastic wheels on each side of the back wheel, his stabilizers, which loyally kept him balanced. So many words and ideas. Some not very sharp. I'll give you "trundled" but why tarmac path specifically? What does tarmac add outside of cramming a bunch of fancy words together. Same with astride. It's a triple tap here of words that aren't very needed in the first place. And then it just keeps going with modifiers and additional information. Why do we need to know about the brackets; we understand what training wheels are. Why loyally? Why not just call them training wheels, you do later. There's so much pretention in this single sentence that makes me ask: why would you present it this way unless your goal was to be obtuse.
Another much leaner not a good transition with all the qualifier. "Another" draws attention to similarity as you completely differentiate them. "Leaner" is almost pointless since the first kid is fat. You're basically saying someone who was not as fat which could be pretty much anything. Just start your sentence: A twelve year old boy. . . twelve year old boy paced along a few steps behind him, with his gaze firmly on the back wheel of the little bike as his companion rolled along the path. Actually like the interesting detail of him focusing on the wheel.
OVERALL
Gramatically solid, but substnatively empty. AI maybe? Having a hard time understanding even the most basic intent here.
RATING: Would not keep reading.Hey i am new on this site, i hope you can review the first chapter, the link is below
Made it about a page so I'll just talk about the things:
A white almirah came into view, I thought this was a mythical creature or something at first but apparently it's furniture. Which begs the question: How does furniture come into view? It doesn't move. It's like you're writing a screen play and describing a camera pan. . . which isn't really how story prose works.
You start the story with your character waking up to an alarm. Boring. Every story does that and there is almost never a reason to. It's happened maybe twice since doing these threads where the choice was compeltely justified.
Dialogue: formatted like a screen play. I don't hate it on it's own surprisingly, but paired with the other problems it communicates a writing issue and not a stylistic choice. Plus you're going to lose out on some presentation by doing it that way.
The realization of time's tyranny jolted him into action. Just an awful sentence. I get that you want to use similee and metaphor (and by all rights you should) but this is purple. Don't sell the most mundane thing in the history of story writing as epic or exciting. It's a dumbass waking up late, not "time's tyranny".
OVERALL
Nothing in the first page that worked for me, plenty that didn't.
RATING: Would Keep ReadingI love this thread! Please, give my humble first chapter a review.
THE GOOD
Great start. Lot's of personality. Loved the description of pecs as big as Bibles, that worked for me. Great start for a comedy, making me laugh a little.
Decent character voice. You obivously go for it and it's a little overbearing at times, but I'm going to say the majority goes in the good catagory.
Really liked the stat chart being used for muscles instead of Rpg stats. This almost implied to me that there might be a progression that would mirror the portal fantasy type stories we see around here which I found pretty funny. But then that turns into a more realistic bit of panic and medical concern which I also liked.
THE BAD
As I said, some of the character voice and language went wayyy overboard for me. At the point where you're giving a "doggo" "scritiches" that's a bit cringe. Like, that's the kind of language I would use if I was making fun of how people on the internet talk. Maybe if there was a level of sarcasm there? I don't know.
I was confused on the world building. You mention Bible and once being religious and I think, that's good characterbuilding. But then there are monster hunters on magazine pages? And Canada? I guess it's an alternative Earth? The dog is kind of fantastical? Really unclear what the idea is. You do mention monster hunters in P2 which is good, but almost if you combined the fantasy and reality together to make it clear. Like say they are on an American magazine. Then I would understand that the author is drawing these two elements together and there would be less ambiguity. Something to clarify.
OVERALL
Pretty fun. Definitely unique. Best of luck.
Last edited: