Not really. Most Americans I met worship guns.
Well that's not been my experience. It depends heavily on what part of the US you're in, because the attitudes of someone in Florida will be very different from a place like Colorado, or New York from Nevada, and further what part of those states you're living in.
I think I may also dare to say that perhaps you are misrepresenting these people, talking about them hyperbolically. I again, do not think it is wrong to like guns if you use them responsibly, and all the people I have met who are gun enthusiasts were very careful with them. This isn't, obviously to say that guns never fall into irresponsible hands. That's foolish and naive. I'm saying that many people want to take guns away from people who use them responsibly, who have the potential to defend others in the event of horrible circumstances.
Just the whole problem with this issue is the refusal of both sides to converse with each other. On the right, people there do not want to discuss the issue, because seizure of personal possessions is viewed as extremely un-American. Conservative individuals view having firearms as a right enshrined in the constitution, that was placed there to protect the people from tyrannical government, and from somewhat more common dangerous situations.
On the left, people are gripped with the horror of seeing mass shootings. They are watching young children and other innocents die. They want to do something, but the other side does not want to budge.
Like many things in life, there is some amount of truth in both viewpoints. I think that both sides need to concede a little, to realize that there are better ways we could regulate firearms, and then that firearms should be protected so people may have the basic right to defend themselves.
I think this would help problems somewhat, but it solves the symptoms of the problem rather than the inherent causes. We really need to examine what can be done to prevent criminals from engaging in such big violent acts. If we cannot figure out how to prevent it, we must do better to react to it. When a shooting happens, it is broadcast all over online, giving the shooter exactly what they wanted. I think also that using tragic events to get people to your news site is pretty despicable.
And I think that if I may go a bit controversial, I think that in the awful circumstance of a shooting occurring, it would save lives if people are present who have a firearm. It is much harder for the shooter to get what they want if several teachers at a school are able to defend.
In the end, there is no clean solution. Any problems involving human beings will always end up super messy, and only are really solved by time replacing a problem with a different one. I think however that decisive action is far past due, like it is on many issues in our society today. It just needs to be a compromise rather than a battle in government. Unfortunately, I see little sign of the government agreeing on anything.
(I apologize if I got too specific in this, and if there are rules that forbid this line of conversation. I'll delete or edit the comment if this is so).