Hi! I have a new novel and I hope you can review it!
The Gods are unfair. My family was ruthlessly slaughtered, and I was sure my own end was imminent. Yet, standing alone at their gravesides, I couldn't bring myself to abandon them. I could only ask why Life was so unfair to us. But then the Gods intervened. As they prepared...
www.scribblehub.com
RATING: Would Keep Reading
THE GOOD
I quite like your writing style. You have some nice flourishes and attempts at style and it all works. It's not the best prose I've ever read, but you strike a nice balance between tempo, readability, and style. There were a handful of sentences/ phrases that absolutely nailed it and I don't recall you missing in any egregious way that became distracting.
I also liked where it went. The sort of "Meeting with God" trope is super over done which makes it a phenominal litmess test for writers. When just about everyone (literally) is writing the same concept, their ability to effectively write really comes through when they know what they're doing. The concept is fun for this scene, it had some minor twists and turns that made it engaging, and while the. . . metaphor(?) was a bit heavy handed, it sets up where I think the story is going in an effective way.
CRITIQUE
There's nothing here I dislike, let's start by saying that. Instead, all I have to offer is the confusing wording of section one.
The name of your story has the word "Ant" in it. So I was very curious to see if this was about literal ants (which I think that's where it's going). HOWEVER, a lot of the stylistic flourishes and language that you use in section 1 seemed to be describing an ant's perspective. I think you were tryig to create a thematic throughline from where we start to where we are going, but 1) that's goofy, and 2) that also means that the language isn't crafted to the literal events happening. It's a little confusing and I don't think it justifies itself.
And now that I think of it, section one also lacks a true establishment and foundation. We get this tragic backstory, but we really lack any context to understand it outside of those typical human emotions you can attribute to a situation like this. What I'm saying is: It works to a point, especially when we get to section 2, but it would work better with a better laid foundation.
OVERALL
Good work.
Hi, is this still open?
I will plug my new story here (in my signature), no rush though.
Thanks in advance!
RATING: Would Keep Reading
THE INTERESTING
I kind of love the way you've played with the elements for this type of story. The mid point that introduces the LRPG/ portal fantasy element is fantastic and done in a very organic way. And like I alluded to, it takes the order this information is typically given in/ happens in and twists it. Great stuff.
I also like the premise of a make-you-own-university. That could be fun. While I'm a little hesitent as the elements connect the way the university will progress seems to be a little meta, it might work.
CRITIQUE AKA THE PROSE
The only thing that needs work here is some of the prose. It feels like it's one editing pass from being a cleaned up version. This isn't to say that it is bad or unreadable, only that it's a tad rough and ready in places. Cut some words here, rephrase a sentence there. The method I use once my prose is at this point is to have it read aloud (by a computer or someone else if you can really get that lucky), but I'm sure you have your methods. If you're great at getting the feel just from reading, maybe add one more pass to your edits and focus on getting rid of redundant or slow words.
OVERALL
Creatively, I think this one is a big win.
I'm doing the first one. You can get back in line in a week for the second if you wish. And I read chapter 1, not zero.
RATING: MIDDLE OF THE ROAD SO WOULD NOT KEEP READING
It was good relative to the star rating you have on this site. Once you dip under 4 stars, I expect it to be awful, but this was pretty standard fair. Didn't love it, didn't hate it. Mostly it didn't affect me at all. Some of the prose and ideas were a little underdeveloped or a childish. I didn't like the constant phrase mommy being used.
But let's not focus too much on the negatives, becaues even if we sanatized this, it wouldn't be a thumbs up. I would focus on doing more with the space you are given. More ideas, more depth, just more. It all feels obligatory, like a chapter you had to write to get to the next one. If I asked you what you found interesting about this chatper, would you have an answer?
Doesn't feel like it.
OVERALL
It's a story.
If you can review the prologue of my book that would be awesome:
Prologue
The rare prologue request.
RATING: MIDDLE OF THE ROAD SO WOULD NOT KEEP READING
THE POEM
Poetry is more my wife's thing than my own, but I'm going to share my opinion anyway since this feels like a soft ball:
“Breaking from dark pits despair, and breathing in a gulp of air. Right away, I'd like to discourage you from the in line rhyming. It feels like lymeric and lymerics are supposed to be jokes. Second, your first idea here is gramatically incorrect. Dark pits of despair. The very first words your reader is seeing are gramatically incorrect. It's not a good first impression. And even if this is intentional for meter or whathaveyou, it's still wrong. You can't just cut parts out to artifically create meter.
You found calming waters cleanse your strife, and solid ground to build your life.
With foundation built your will turned steel, with a burning passion none could steal. You rhyme steal with steel. You know that's a lazy cop out. Why start us off with a poem if you don't want to write a poem. Let's be clear, this doesn't add anything to the experience outside of the contained experience of reading a poem. The first three lines are filler.
To find the light that shines within, or lose your fight to demon king.” Within and king are not even slant rhymes. Why establish a structure if you aren't going to follow your own rules. And while intorudcing us to this demon king idea is probably a good idea in the context of where we go from here, it's severely uncut by the stanza. The first thing your reader reads shouldn't be where you've given up.
THE ACTUAL STORY! (THE GOOD)
Conceptually, I like May's right eye. I'm not sure if you're drawing from something there, but it's unique to me and a pretty fun idea to the point where I absolutely wan to see this featured in a fantasy novel.
I also think you keep us moving. There's action, adventure, some twists and turns. It has the drive a chapter likes this needs. Some of the conflict gets a bit loosy goosy. There isn't a clear objective set up from the start, the stakes are somewhat all over the place. It feels very intuitive with the writer trying their hardest to entertain without necessarily knowing the beats they should be hitting (or subverting if they are that good).
THE CRITIQUE
First off, let's talk about the prose. It reads distinctly like a well polished highschool piece by someone who wants to write a fantasy novel (with a capital n). It's rough, it's under prooved, there are sure signs of effort and attempt there, but no single paragraph ever rises to the level of being great.
Like, geez, how many times do you say "special eye" in the first page. Redundancy is the number one sign of an amateur writer. Faster, more trust in your reader.
This is a prologue. It's the least important part of any narrative and mostly exists for the author's own edification. Ideally, it serves as an entertaining short story that the reader can come back to and glean more understanding from after reading your book.
You are sitting on almost 19 pages here. That is longer than almost any prologue needs to be. If you want it to be that long, it has to be 100% justified. It has to move and it has to entertain. As is, you could cut down 50% of what you have here and not loose much of anything. That probably seems harsh when I also say it moves, but let's reframe it. What's the take away? What do you want your audience to experience with this prologue? You could structure this in a way where the intent is met in a shorter space, IMO.
Once again, the exception to that is if it's just that darn entertaining, and I can think of maybe two prologues I've ever read that fit that bill.
OVERALL
I don't want to be discouraging here. This reads like someone with a tiny bit of experience being very ambitious and not even failing. Just not suceeding. If you're 30 or younger, keep at it and work on your craft. Learn all you can and really do a deep dive on your writing. There are good instincts here to hone and perfect.
And if you are older than 30, you're probably going to need a major shift in how you are approaching this. Less wild ideas and more academic structure.