Beta_Krogoth
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2021
- Messages
- 84
- Points
- 58
Personally can't stand it in any way, shape or form. Stops me from enjoying content, do not understand the appeal at all.
Welcome to minority groubs broPersonally can't stand it in any way, shape or form. Stops me from enjoying content, do not understand the appeal at all.
Some of the biggest revenue from porn titles include incestuous themes, it is way more common you might think.there are a certain niche of readers who like it.
You're probably right about the revenue. People who are into porn kind of need something more and more taboo to get the juice flowing. It's best to just find someone and be monogamous... if you don't want to speed down that rabbit hole... but people have the right to do what they want as long as they aren't hurting others and it's consensual.Some of the biggest revenue from porn titles include incestuous themes, it is way more common you might think.
But of course that doesn't mean those people would actually commit such an act, well at least most of them.
Such decent explanation....Well, as with many other things, Japan's view on incest is completely different from ours in the West. It is also taboo for them but not in the same way. They strongly believe in the fates and reincarnation, so being lovers from a past life and being reincarnated as siblings is either fate's ultimate insult (because siblings could never be together as in a "star-crossed lovers" way) or fate's ultimate reward (because you were "fated" to be together since born) so it depends on the circumstances. There is a cultural thing that the big sibling must protect the younger sibling at all costs, so is not rare that some siblings to develop the "big brother/siter complex", the younger siblings admire and worship the older one so much that are afraid to "lose" him/her to a stranger, thus becoming extremely jealous and attached, even if they aren't sexually attracted.
So yeah, the trope is prevalent in anime because of that. But what do I know, anyway? I'm just a dinosaur.
Ya could make a thread about thatIt made me think: does non-incestual relationship be considered Outcest?
And moral reasons.I think its fine.
Incest is really only a 'taboo' because of health reasons. Health is beyond the universe of most webnovels, so it doesn't really matter. Just dont reproduce with your actual sibling.
I don't see any moral issues with incest. 2 consenting adults having an intimate relationship should have no moral issues because they are blood related imo. The only moral issue is giving your offspring a high chance of an unhealthy birth, which again comes back to being a health issue.And moral reasons.
Subjective morality does not exist. That theory has been extensively debunked time and time again with tens of thousands of pages of detail and the concept of subjective morality can be used to justify universally despicable and abhorrent things such as genocide.I don't see any moral issues with incest. 2 consenting adults having an intimate relationship should have no moral issues because they are blood related imo. The only moral issue is giving your offspring a high chance of an unhealthy birth, which again comes back to being a health issue.
Moral in the end is something very subjective, which is why I didn't mention it.
A "few" years back incest was encouraged in most parts of western culture. Mainly because they didn't know about the health issues.
Due to discovered health risks society started shunning incest, which is good. Biology does exist in real life afterall.
Since it all ties back to health defects for the children I think it has no moral conflict at all. Which is why I think incest should be accepted for gay couples, since they can't have children anyway.
I simplified things quite a bit but I hope this makes my viewpoint clear. As mentioned, morals are purely subjective so I hope no one takes this as anything but a subjective view on this topic.
P.S.: My opinion can change in the future, don't hold this 3 am post against me when I say something else in the future.
I don't care about it. I don't actively seek it out, but the most "incest" I see with the media I consume is like a little sister being very clingy, devoted, and/or doting to her brother and I find that cute. It's not the "fucking" aspect of it that attracts me. Either way, I don't have strong feelings about it.I personally felt uncofortable when watching this anime genre. Sadly, I lately find that this genre is too common.
.
Bruh, isn't it a bit... Immoral and taboo?
Huh? theory? debunked?Subjective morality does not exist. That theory has been extensively debunked time and time again with tens of thousands of pages of detail
it would be hard to justify something like that with just that. But on this point, if a dictator views it as moral to do so, then it is subjective, since there is diversity in the view on the matter of genocide. It is only objective if it is the same for EVERYONE. Physics and math is objective, you dont have lower gravity because you are a farmer or whatever.the concept of subjective morality can be used to justify universally despicable and abhorrent things such as genocide.
Yes it is "hardcoded" into us to avoid incest. That is because of biology. Survival of the fittest. Incest children had lower survival rates, due to health issues. Through that we learned early on to avoid incest after a bunch of generations. Its just our survival instinct, like avoiding pain, nothing to with morality. Unless you want to say that falling down and getting hurt is immoral.The morality of incest was molded around the subconscious instinctual knowledge that it isn’t best to fuck my sibling. This instinctual knowledge was developed by evolution.
sry I dont get this sentence.The morality against genocide was that unconscious instinct resurfacing into a conscious form to further reinforce the idea that you shouldn’t fuck your sibling.
I assume youre talking about books whne you say thousands of pages, since no amount of papers will get you that much. Books are not proof in any capacity. Books are not peer vewied, they are subjectively written by people with the same view on things. You can use such books to learn more about topics and along with other books you can build an opinion on a topic with them. Not proof. Even relevant sience papers are not hard proof as we do not understand human psychology at all yet, so even if there is a relevant paper with only positive citations, its more of a "yeah Ill accept that until we find out more".tens of thousands of pages