The demographic is women raised on the idea of modern femanism. It’s essentially what’s taught in schools these days in big cities. You may not get it as much in rural areas, but big cities(Californian or New York cities for example, or just large democratic ones) are just a shit hole of narcissism. You can’t say or think for yourself anymore and have to say what everyone else considers politically correct. What you consider narcissism will really vary from person to person. Also when I say basically a narcissist that’s just a generalization of the statement anyway, the stats are pretty pointless.
??
I am confused, first I do live in a big city... Tho I don't live in one with a culture that appears to push people into extremities of democratic and not democratic... My reality of "narcissism based on being women" does not seem true...
if it is as you say that narcissism is prevalent in big cities and not much so in rural areas, does that mean America is 99%+ in big cities? From what I see even if your statement is true about women and narcissism.... 21 per cent of America is rural areas... Even if you are generous, in pushing that... 99% it simply does not seem to be likely... and it is unlikely that 100% of any city subscribe to the same ideology...
Whatsmore
"Also when I say basically a narcissist that’s just a generalization of the statement anyway, the stats are pretty pointless."
But doesn't that just invalidate your claim here?
It’s just the current generation of women is at a 99%+ failure rate in terms of being the slightest bit attractive personality wise. Finding a healthy relationship with a women in these times is gradually approaching zero. A lot of guys just aren’t even interested in relationships with women anymore because of what many women have become.
making what you are saying is pointless? Due to varying degrees of defining "attractive personality"
But I don't really care about any of that... I mean I just wanna know how many narcissists you have actually met that lets you make that 99%+ claim.
What I am interested in is how many personal experiences a person have to have for them to subscribe to a worldview?
I mean... Surely, a person would not just be making assumptions on things as facts just by hearing second-hand accounts and parroting ideologies of others as their own... That would mean they are incapable of using their own eyes to form an independent assessment of the world.
And that is just sad.
I am just an avocado, and since you didn't throw me any number to crunch, and what you said is pointless... this discussion has exceeded my attention span and interest, so laters, and have a good life.